« Back to Results

Labor, Security and Power Dynamics in the Labor Market

Paper Session

Saturday, Jan. 3, 2026 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM (EST)

Philadelphia Convention Center
Hosted By: Association for Evolutionary Economics & Association for Social Economics
  • Chair: Valerie Kepner, King's College

Bargaining Power Index - A Distributional Approach

Hoa Vo
,
American University
Natalia Radchenko
,
American University

Abstract

In the context of widening inequalities and persistent gender stratifications, accurate measurement of individual agency within households has become increasingly important for understanding the ethical and distributive dimensions of economic life.
Bargaining power within households — the dynamics that influence decision-making, resource allocation, and individual well-being — has long been a central concern in fields such as household economics and development studies.
While recent surveys in developing countries often include decision-making questions over expenditures, labor, and time use, existing approaches in economic literature typically aggregate these into composite indices that inadequately capture the nuances of decision making process and bargaining power.
This paper highlights limitations of these existing indexes and proposes a distribution-sensitive alternative: an index that assigns weights based on the probabilistic distribution of responses. By giving greater emphasis to deviations from dominant/mainstream social norms, our approach captures meaningful variations and deviations in individual agency relative to the social norms. It recognizes that conformity to or divergence from normative patterns carries substantive informational value about power, constraint, and voice within households. Our approach thus offers a more ethically attuned and analytically rigorous tool for examining how resource distribution, gendered power structures, and social norms intersect to shape economic outcomes — a critical perspective amidst today's deepening inequalities and fraying institutional supports.

Pay Her More and Other Strategies for Closing the Gender Wage Gap

Valerie Kepner
,
King's College
Paula Cole
,
University of Denver

Abstract

The U.S. gender wage gap is well documented and acknowledged by many Americans—less clear is why and how to reduce this economic problem. This paper seeks to outline the weakened economic power women have from lower wages and propose key changes that will help close the gender wage gap. The most direct way to close the gender wage gap is to increase her earnings. We examine how raising the national minimum wage would improve the earnings of women. Additionally, we evaluate efforts to improve pay transparency to give women more economic power. Finally, we examine the importance of reproductive freedom as necessary for closing the gender wage gap and this fight over economic power.

Rethinking Job Security: Alternatives to the Tenure Model in a Changing Labor Market

Miki Malul
,
Ben Gurion University

Abstract

As the labor market undergoes rapid transformation, the traditional tenure model faces increasing scrutiny. This study investigates alternative policy models that could provide job security in a dynamic employment landscape. Specifically, we analyze how individuals assess job security across three key dimensions: income stability, employment continuity assurance, and workplace security. We simulate various welfare policy scenarios, including alternative unemployment benefit structures, workfare programs, and basic income models.

The Pain of Creative Destruction

Ranganath Murthy
,
Western New England University

Abstract

Mainstream economic theory argues that free trade benefits the nation as a whole: the gains of the winners are large enough to more than compensate the losses suffered by the losers. In practice, such compensation has not transcended the hypothetical. The pain of creative destruction has hence fallen most heavily on those least able to withstand its perennial gale—workers, who have nothing to sell but their own labor. The mechanistic models of mainstream economic theory assume implicitly that labor markets are fluid and frictionless, even in the relatively short run. In such a world, workers who lose their jobs to cheap imports will quickly find good jobs in booming industries, by relocating if necessary. In recent years, mainstream and even some conservative economists are waking up to the fact that globalization has not led to widely shared prosperity. This essay surveys the impact of trade on jobs in the United States since the end of World War II.

Vietnam's Economic Development: The Making, Remaking and Unmaking Experience of Rural Women Workers

Thuy Do
,
Hoa Sen University

Abstract

The two most significant economic policies in contemporary Vietnam are [Đổi Mới] renovation policy in 1986 and the New Rural Development Program (NRDP)—a national target program effectuating Resolution 26-NQ/TW in 2008 at the 10th Central Committee meeting on agriculture, farmers, and the countryside. While Đổi Mới policy presented as the first period of the modern Vietnamese state/party’s economic development aligns with development theories and practices—industrialization, modernization, capitalization, and internationalization/globalization, the NRDP is a post-development practice. Critiques of these policies have been made widely, focusing primarily on Vietnam’s economic development failures and performances/achievements but not analyzing how Vietnamese people experienced Vietnam’s economic development. This essay fills this gap by examining the economic history and the rural development of the Bình Lộc rubber farm as a case study to illustrate the making— Đổi Mới policy, remaking—the NRDP, and unmaking—the care of social justice in Bình Lộc rubber farm through the experience of Rural Women Workers (RWWs). First, I explore how rural-urban migration trends due to Đổi Mới policy and the NRDP affect RWWs in Bình Lộc rubber farm. Second, I explore how RWWs experience the past vs present and new vs old of the Bình Lộc rubber farm. On the one hand, Đổi Mới policy and the NRDP
JEL Classifications
  • J0 - General
  • B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches