Seasonality and Welfare in Low Income Countries
Paper Session
Saturday, Jan. 3, 2026 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM (EST)
- Chair: Ethan Ligon, University of California-Berkeley
Seasonal Employment and Development
Abstract
Traditional agriculture follows natural cycles. Especially low-incomecountries experience large seasonality in agricultural activity. A
growing literature studies how the resulting seasonality in consumption
could be smoothed over time and across space, for example by enabling
seasonal changes in sectoral employment. However, how seasonality in
employment may vary with and matter for development is not
well-understood. In this paper, we highlight, first, how seasonality in
employment varies across different income levels: using quarterly,
nationally representative survey data to track employment, we document
that seasonality in sectoral employment increases with income at first,
but decreases (and eventually disappears) at middle income levels.
Second, we show how failing to account for potentially stark seasonality
in employment affects estimates of relevant macroeconomic indicators,
such as the progress of structural change, or the size of sectoral and
spatial productivity gaps. Estimates are particularly sensitive at
income levels where measuring both accurately seem paramount. In a
sample of mostly low- and lower middle-income countries, peak to trough
agricultural season estimates of productivity gaps can vary by a factor
of four. Finally, we develop a model of structural transformation that
can replicate both the variation in seasonal employment across income
levels, but also features a source of heterogeneity in seasonality at
given levels of development.
Retrieval Failures and Consumption Smoothing: A Field Experiment on Seasonal Poverty
Abstract
Individuals may fail to recall and use information they already know when making decisions. We empirically investigate whether such "retrieval failures" distort consumption smoothing behavior among Zambian farmers, who derive their income from one annual harvest and then spend it down over the course of the year. We document that individuals underestimate upcoming spending by 50%, creating scope for under-saving. In order to improve recall, we randomize an intervention that prompts individuals to think through their future expenses associatively in categories — without providing any external information or guidance. Treated individuals increase "remembered expenses by 42%; as predicted by the memory literature, effects are concentrated among small, irregular, and stochastic items. Immediate spending drops and, two months after the intervention, treated households hold 15% higher savings. They subsequently enter the "hungry season" — the final months of the year when consumption typically declines sharply — with one additional month of savings, leading to a flatter spending profile over the year. Households use the increased savings to self-finance additional farm investment, resulting in a 9% increase in the next year's crop revenue. We replicate the intervention's impact on beliefs among low-income Americans, suggesting that retrieval failures generalize across settings and populations.Discussant(s)
Kathleen Beegle
,
World Bank
Paul Christian
,
World Bank
Brian Dillon
,
Cornell University
JEL Classifications
- D9 - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics
- O1 - Economic Development