This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. American Economic Review
  4. March 1999
  5. Rules of Thumb versus Dynamic Programming

American Economic Review

ISSN 0002-8282 (Print) | ISSN 1944-7981 (Online)

Rules of Thumb versus Dynamic Programming

  • Martin Lettau
  • Harald Uhlig
American Economic Review
vol. 89, no. 1, March 1999
(pp. 148–174)
Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

This paper studies decisionmaking with rules of thumb in the context of dynamic decision problems and compares it to dynamic programming. A rule is a fixed mapping from a subset of states into actions. Rules are compared by averaging over past experiences. This can lead to favoring rules which are only applicable in good states. Correcting this good state bias requires solving the dynamic program. The authors provide a general framework and characterize the asymptotic properties. They apply it to provide a candidate explanation for the sensitivity of consumption to transitory income.

Citation

Lettau, Martin, and Harald Uhlig. 1999. "Rules of Thumb versus Dynamic Programming." American Economic Review 89 (1): 148–174. DOI: 10.1257/aer.89.1.148

JEL Classification

  • C61 Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
  • E21 Macroeconomics: Consumption; Saving; Wealth